HIDE

Other Publications

Insights

Publications

I.R.S. Issues Regulations Regarding P.F.I.C. Reporting Requirements

Read Publication

On December 30, 2013, the I.R.S. released temporary and final regulations regarding P.F.I.C. reporting requirements. In T.D. 9650, the I.R.S. reaffirmed that it would not require any U.S. persons that owned any interest in a P.F.I.C. during 2010, 2011 or 2012 to file an information return on Form 8621 under the new rules unless they sold the stock, received a distribution or needed to make a P.F.I.C. election. However, Form 8621 will be required to be filed by any U.S. person that owned at any time during 2013 an interest in a P.F.I.C. Thus the form will filed with the 2013 income tax return that must be filed later this year.

The regulations adopted rules addressing constructive or indirect ownership. The constructive ownership or attribution rules can cause a person to become an owner of an interest in a P.F.I.C. even though no stock is directly owned in the P.F.I.C. As a result, ownership of P.F.I.C stock by a corporation, partnership, trust or estate can be attributed to the entity’s shareholders, partners or beneficiaries, who then can become subject to the P.F.I.C. rules.

BACKGROUND

U.S. investors must determine if any foreign corporation owned may be classified as a P.F.I.C. A foreign corporation will be classified as a P.F.I.C. if either (i) 75% or more of the corporation's gross income is passive income (such as from interest, dividends or capital gains) or (ii) 50% or more of the corporation's assets are held for the production of passive income (such as stocks, bonds or cash). A typical P.F.I.C. is an offshore investment company or mutual fund although P.F.I.C. status can be a potential issue for any foreign corporation, especially if the corporation has large cash reserves or is in the services business outside the U.S.

Year-End Review: I.R.S. O.V.D.P.

Read Publication

The I.R.S. and the Department of Justice (“D.O.J.”) continued their tenacious efforts against offshore tax evasion. Three major events took place in 2013: (i) a shift in the methodology to detect quiet disclosures; (ii) the bank voluntary disclosure program (“B.V.D.P.”) announced by the United States and Switzerland on August 29, 2013, and (iii) certain notable convictions, plea deals, and civil penalties.

We expect the I.R.S. and D.O.J.’s unwavering focus on offshore tax evasion to continue in 2014 as F.A.T.C.A begins to be implemented. Some practitioners fear that when F.A.T.C.A. information reporting begins, the O.V.D.P. may end, as the I.R.S. will have received information automatically on foreign accounts. If a U.S. taxpayer remains uncertain about declaring foreign financial accounts, now is the time to take remedial action. There is no Plan B, if time runs out.

QUIET DISCLOSURES

While the I.R.S. officially has discouraged quiet disclosures, a Government Accountability Office (“G.A.O”) report, released on April 26, 2013, identified shortcomings in the I.R.S.’s ability to detect quiet disclosures. According to the G.A.O. report:

[The] G.A.O. analyzed amended returns filed for tax year 2003 through tax year 2008, matched them to other information available to IRS about taxpayers' possible offshore activities, and found many more potential quiet disclosures than IRS detected. Moreover, IRS has not researched whether sharp increases in taxpayers reporting offshore accounts for the first time is due to efforts to circumvent monies owed, thereby missing opportunities to help ensure compliance . . . Taxpayer attempts to circumvent taxes, interest, and penalties by not participating in an offshore program, but instead simply amending past returns or reporting on current returns previously unreported offshore accounts, result in lost revenues and undermine the programs' effectiveness.

Outbound Acquisitions: European Holding Company Structures [2014]

Published by the Practising Law Institute in the Corporate Tax Practice Series: Strategies for Corporate Acquisitions, Dispositions, Spin-Offs, Joint Ventures, Reorganizations & Restructurings, 2014.

Read More

Year-End Review: Net Investment Income Tax

Read Publication

The Net Investment Income Tax (“N.I.I.T.”) was added to the Code on March 30, 2010. It is imposed at a rate of 3.8% of certain net investment income (“Net Investment Income”) of individuals, estates and trusts having income above specified triggering amounts. For individuals who are calendar year taxpayers, the tax first became effective in 2013. Thus, the current tax return filing season will be the first time taxpayers feel the effect of the tax. In late 2013, the I.R.S. released final and proposed regulations for the N.I.I.T. These regulations clarify proposals that were issued on December 5, 2012. This article provides a summary of the N.I.I.T. and explains how the new regulations will affect taxpayers.

IN GENERAL

Applicable Thresholds

Individuals will owe the tax if they have Net Investment Income and also have modified adjusted gross income over the following thresholds:

Filing StatusThreshold Amount
Married Taxpayers (Joint Filing)$250,000
Married Taxpayers (Separate Filing)$125,000
Single$200,000
Head of household (with qualifying person)$200,000
Qualifying widow(er) with dependent child$250,000

These amounts are not indexed for inflation.

A Layman's Guide to FATCA Due Diligence and Reporting Obligations

Published by Bloomberg BNA in Tax Management International Journal, 42 TMIJ 75: 2013.

Read More

Outbound Acquisitions: European Holding Company Structures [2013]

Published by the Practising Law Institute in the Corporate Tax Practice Series, 2013.

Read More

Outbound Acquisitions: European Holding Company Structures [2012]

Published by the Practising Law Institute in the Corporate Tax Practice Series, 2012.

Read More

Structuring International Operations Following 2010 Legislation

The 60th Tulane Tax Institute: October 26‐28, 2011.

Read More

Governments and Information Gathering: Impact on MNE Planning

Published by Bloomberg BNA in the Tax Management International Journal, Vol. 39, No. 12: 2010.

Read More

Tax Planning and Compliance for Foreign Businesses with U.S. Activity

Published 2009.

Read More

Procedures Announced for Mandatory Arbitration under Germany-United States Tax Treaty

Published by the International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation (IBFD) in the Bulletin for International Taxation, Tax Treaty Monitor: April 2009.

Read More

Practice Exposures for the International Tax Professions in the 21st Century

Published in the Tax Management International Journal, Vol. 37, No. 8: 2008.

Read More

Tax Concepts Affecting the Foreign Entertainer or Athlete Performing in the United States

Published in the Tax Management International Journal, Vol. 37, No. 5: 2008.

Read More

Hybrid Entities in Cross Border Transactions: The Canadian Experience - The U.S. Response [2008]

Published by the Practising Law Institute (PLI) in the Partnership Tax Practice Series: Planning for Domestic & Foreign Partnerships, LLCs, Joint Ventures & Other Strategic Alliances, 2008.

Read More

Home Thoughts From Abroad: Foreign Purchases of U.S. Homes

Published in TAX NOTES Tax Analysts Special Report, September 2007.

Read More

Preimmigration Income Planning and Ethical Issues in Representing the Foreign Individual

New York University Summer Institute, International Taxation: 2007.

Read More

Economic Substance Around the World

Joint Meeting of the American Bar Association – Section of Taxation: May 2004.

Read More

Recent Developments in U.S. Tax Law Affecting International Transactions

American Bar Association – Section of Taxation's Foreign Lawyers Forum: December 2003.

Read More

Inbound Update: Increasing Attention by the I.R.S. to Foreign Taxpayers Doing Business in the U.S. [2002]

New York University Summer Institute, International Taxation: 2002.

Read More

Exchange of Information

Step 2002 National Conference.

Read More