In 2017, the O.E.C.D. stated that the question of whether a home office constitutes a P.E. is rarely a practical issue because the majority of employees reside in the state where their employer has an office. Although that observation was undoubtedly accurate at the time, today it is safe to say that it did not age well. Paul Kraan, a Partner of Van Campen Liem, Attorneys and Tax Advisers, Amsterdam, and Mitchell Karman, an associate at Van Campen Liem, Attorneys and Tax Advisers, Amsterdam, explain the international tax implications of remote workers from a corporate income tax perspective, based on the O.E.C.D. Model Convention framework. Not surprisingly they point out ways in which the current framework arguably does not result in a desirable outcome. The article concludes with several recommendations.